Impact on Spending 2016-2017

Previous Academic Year 2016-2017
    i.    Quality of teaching for all
Desired outcome Chosen action/approach Estimated impact: Lessons learned  Cost
Increased number of children achieving a GLD at the end of EYFS An additional, experienced Teacher to work across Early Years. Increased numbers of children achieving GLD at the end of Reception. 

With some children there has been a noticeable improvement in their self-confidence.

 

PP children were identified on planning and as a result children made better progress.

 

Higher achieving children were targeted more effectively.

This approach was successful and this approach will be modified and used in future. 

Children achieving expected standard or above by the end of Reception

 

2014- 27.6%

2015- 43.3%

2016- 58.5%

2017- 67.7%

 

A contribution of £124,795 was taken from PP funding towards staffing costs.
Increased number of children achieving expected standards in reading, writing and maths. An additional teacher working across Middle School and an additional teacher working across Upper School. Vulnerable groups were given more support.Children were taught in smaller groups.

 

Specific interventions put in place for key marginal children and as a result there was an increased number of children achieving the expected standard in reading, writing and maths.

 

PP children were identified on planning, work differentiated appropriately and as a result children made better progress.

 

Higher achieving children were targeted more effectively.

This approach was successful and this approach will be modified and used in future. 

Key Stage 1

Subject School National
Reading 83% 74%
Writing 66% 65%
Mathematics 79% 73%

 

Key Stage 2 

Key Stage 2 Results Brentnall CommunityPrimary School National
%of pupils achieving the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics 38% 53%
%of pupils achieving the expected standard in reading 38% 66%
%of pupils achieving the expected standard in writing 73% 74%
%of pupils achieving the expected standard in mathematics 73% 70%
Average progress in reading -2.5 (Average) -5.1 to 0.1
Average progress in writing 1.8 (Average) -0.8 to 4.4
Average progress in mathematics 3.2 (Well Above Average) 1 to 5.4
%of pupils achieving a high level of attainment in reading writing and mathematics 0% 5%
Average scaled score in reading 98 103
Average scaled score in mathematics 105 103
   ii.    Targeted support
Desired outcome Chosen action/approach Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Lessons learned(and whether you will continue with this approach) Cost
Achievement for All used to target vulnerable groups of children. Vulnerable groups identified and parents/ carers invited in for a number of structured conversations throughout the year. The majority of parents/ carers attended the meetings and were willing to work alongside school to meet the targets that were set. 

Targets were then reviewed at the end of each assessment cycle with the parents/ carers.

 

We found was the language barrier was an issue with some parents/ carers as a number of our parents have EAL.

This approach will be used again this year. Staff will continue to receive CPD to support them. 

 

 

 

 

Pay for interrupters where needed.

£4171
EAL children to make better than expected progress and to demonstrate increased confidence in social situations. A teacher to support EAL children x4 mornings a week. Children new to English received an intensive language support for 8 weeks. Some children were withdrawn from their classes to work on specific areas. 

Some children who received the intensive language support made significant progress.

 

During pupil progress meetings at the end of each cycle staff will be assigned according to the needs of the children.

 

If there is a need later in the year language support will be put in place.
Funding for extra curricular activities PP children have a contribution paid towards the cost of after school clubs such as horse riding and trampolining. Children who otherwise wouldn’t have had the opportunity were able to attend a variety of different after school clubs. 

Children were able to socialise with a variety of different children.

 

For some children it has been noticed that there has been a increase in confidence.

 

Children had non-academic achievements celebrated in assemblies.

This approach will continue to be used this year. £146